Page 106 - index
P. 106

dren.  On  the firstpoint, theii Loidships have no difficulty
                                                                               not
                                         in coming to the conclusion that the gift u~s excessise in.
                                         relation to the propcrty  of  the donm.  It was about the hun-
                                         dredth part of  it.  Whercver  a  gift  of  a  part of a donoi's
                                         propeity haa  Lieeii discussed and tested with rcference to
                                         its aniount, a proportion sosmall asthishaa never Lieen rr-
                                         garded as excessive. It was contended that,, in, considering
                                         this question, the va.lue of  the gifts made to the othcr rcla-
                                         tions  should  be  estimated:  but,  thoiigh the faït of  these
                                         othei gifts cannot  be  excludcd, and for somi:  purposes  it
                                         might be very materia.1 ta considei them,  each gift., in  the
                                         end, must be decilied on  its  own  merits.  All  these  gifts,
                                         however,  if  takcn  toget,her, amount  only  to  about  one
                                         tenth  of  the donor's  wealth, a  proportion  less than  any
                                         share which  French  writers  have  regard~d as  excessive.
                                         As already stated, one sixth  in the  lalvest  mentionned
                                         by  them.  MI.  Justice  Ramsay, in  his  judgment,  says
                                         that hc had found no case, where the amount uSssinques-
                                         tion, in which a donation of lessthanone-sixthwasset aside.
                                           Then,it is to he considered whether this dana.tion woiild
                                         have been made if the donor had contemplated the birth of
                                         children. This question natiiially opens an inquiry into the
                                         circumstances attending the gift.  Ricard, in  the passage
                                         cited above, ailudcs to those deemed to ùe iiiaterial.
                                           Thevalue is of  course material; so also are the motives  of
                                         thegift,andtheii therelation of the donee~ to thedonor.  The
                                         circumstances in thi~ ca.se are, that for many years after her
                                         mother's death, Lri  hfarquise lived withher Aunt Luce,and
                                         in the society of hcr cousins.  It was nntural that she should
                                         have become attached to theni,and, when on her fathei's
                                         death, she succeeded to his largo wcalth,and to her iiiother's
                                         not inconsiderable propeit,y, that she should desùe to rnake
                                         somc  prcaent  ta  them.  Her  gift  is  for personal  objects,
                                         being described to be "pour partiedeleursfraisdetoilette et
                                         autres petits  besoins  pemonnels",  and  therefore is  of a
                                         kind which might weli spring from her own wish to gratfs
                                         her cousins.  It is evident that she believed that her mo-
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111