Page 103 - index
P. 103

uncondiliorial,  whilst, if found iii the other, it iinplies that
                                   tlie cnndition was alaays inhcreiit in the gift.
                                     In 1751, the Ordinnncr of  Zcliis Xl?., entitled "Ordon-
                                   nace sur les donations "ahich  n.doplei1 toitsfiillcxtent,
                                   the law  "Si  iinqiinm."  scttled the 1:iiv of  Francte upon  t,he
                                   siihject.  By Art,. 39 it was etiacted that sll gifts made b>r
                                   persans aho hsd  not childrennt the time. af  the  donation,
                                   'f
                                    de qiiclque valeur que les dites doiiatians puiaseiit Qtre,B
                                   quelque titrï qu'elles  aient 4th faites,. . . rlenïfureronl  ré-
                                   cnqu&s  de &?i'li  drnil pur  10 S!Lrce.JianCe. d'lmenfarrl kgilinle du
                                   donotÿur".
                                     This Onlinancc,  wliich  was framcd :~fter carefiil inqui-
                                   ry into the csistiiig jiiris~>rudcnr!c of  liinncc I>y C,hancellor
                                   d'Aguc,sscau, cont,ains  a cornpletc code on the subject  of
                                   donatioiis, aiid it vas coritrndcd,  on ttie par( of  the Appel-
                                   lants, that  il riught  to  ùc  regnrdod  asdnclarato~~ the
                                                                                of
                                   existing Law.  It appears thÿt D'Apueuseau formulatcd cer-
                                   tain questions, and wht theni, 6th cxplanetory letters, to
                                   al1 the Parliaments  Extracts aere read frorii thcse lctters
                                   t,o sliu\v thnt  t,hc Chanrellor'.:  ol>ject ans to  reform  t,he
                                  discoidant .jicriopmdence  of  the   court,^, so  that  tlie  Iaw
                                   throughout  France ùhould  t~e uniform.  i3ut t,he jurispru-
                                   dence of eacli Pnrliaineril hÿd taken root within  its  liuuts
                                   forming the law dininist,cred there, and their Lordshilis do
                                  not gst,lier from these letters that the (~hnrcllor supposed
                                   that the contemplat,ed Ordinance rould be  a inere declara-
                                   tion of existi~iglaw. IIe sclcîtcd from the jiirispriidence  of
                                   cnch Parliament  what he coiisidcred to be good, and fit to
                                  k incorpoiatcd int,o  th^ genersl tau. he proposed tofranie.
                                     It appcar? thnt the  Chaiicellor  contemphted  the  for-
                                  matiou  of  a getiernl ïi~de of  Iaw, and  conirnenr~rl with t,he
                                  subject of donations as king, in his vieil,, one of  the most
                                   simple and t,he lrast difficiilt.  (Sce  hi3 letter of  the 3rd of
                                  May,  1730: to M. de Machault,, Consei1li.r d'État, who wns
                                  chargeil  wit,h making a  ~Patiml of  tlir  obseivatio~ of  the
                                  Parlianients arid 0ther.s :sipon the (~iiestionsahich had been
                                  put  to theiii).  In this lcttrr tlie  Clia~icellor~ after staiing
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108