Page 104 - index
P. 104

that  al1 the  Parliaments and "Counscils  YupPrieurs" had
                                        sent answers to bis questions, says:  "II s'agit à présent de
                                        se servir de tant de bons matériaux pour en former une loi",
                                        which shoiild  be  of  zt  nature to stimulate iurllier exerîion
                                        in  the same direction  and in  t,hc same letter he says the
                                        ohjeït was  "à  établir des régles certaines et iinifoimes sus
                                         ce qui fait le sujet d'une divcraité de jurisprudence."
                                          But, whatc~er may he the infeionce to hc derived from
                                        t,hesî letters,  the  Ordinance of  1781 contains within  itself
                                        abundont cvidencc  Lhat  it was not  intented to he a mere
                                        declaration of  existing Iaw   It cont.aiiis soine provisions
                                        which are undoubtedly new.  Thus Art. 4.5 enacts that the
                                        period of  preacriptiun shall I>e t,hirtg ycars after the  day of
                                        the birth of  the last child of  the donoi.  And Ar.1. Sri  itself
                                        is  inore  strigent in its details  than  the lnwi'Si unqiiam."
                                        Rut Art. 47 is derisivr «il this question.  It repr.11~ "toutcs
                                        ordonnances, lois.  coiit,iiines, statuts et  ueageo"  ïuritraiy
                                        to the piaviaioris containcd in  the Ordinance,andprovides
                                        that dunations mnde before its piihlication werc not to  be
                                        attacked iindei prptext  tha.t they ivere not in  confornlity
                                        with its niles;  "notre  intention étant qu'rllcs soient ex&-
                                        rées ainsi qu'rllcs ûimicnt pli et dû l'êti.eauparavant,et que
                                        les rontcstatioiis  n6es ct rl naître  sui. leur exéciition soient
                                        decidées s~ivant ICR lois et In juiisprudence  qui ont eii lieii
                                        jusqii'à  pr6sent dans nos cour? à ret Cgard."
                                           Cornidering. thi:ri, tht this Ordinancc enacts n npiv lav
                                        on the  point in  question  il u:oiiM no1 be  of  force Iri  Canada
                                        unless il hnd  been ~egis'ered thme.  The Appeliants'  Counsel
                                        rclicd on thv iiiji~nction of  thr:  Orclinancc rcquiring it to hc
                                        obeyerl "dans tout notr.~? ro'nuinc,  torres ct pays de notre
                                        obéi~ssnco," but a  ltoyal  Ordinaiice: published  ;ifter  the
                                        establishiiiciil of  "Le C:onseil Supérieur" in Canada by the
                                        Edict of  1653, dit n»t take effect in that province proprio vi-
                                        gore until  it was registered  : Hiitchinson vs  Gillespie  (1)
                                        les Seun HospitalièreadeSt-JO&   vs Rliddeliniss above
                                            (1)  4 3filurre'a P. C. 371.
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109