Page 155 - Transcriptions d'actes notariés - Tome 20 - 1682-1686
P. 155

t
                                     mcnf ei  ~olei;nr!lciiicn~  viiier  au  Par1emr:it  e:i  1lii.rur d'une  1é:islaiiciii
                                     rend3111 E  la  irii~ioriié catliolique  riu  3Ianiialra  les  droiis  scolnireà
                                     lni  *on1  recoIiiiuu  par  I'honorahlr  (:o~iscil PrivC  d'Angleirrre.  Ce  grave
                                     ilr-voir s'irnpoze  i iuat  non  ca~holiqiie et  ious  wrier justifisbies,  ni  devant
                                                     ni
                                     vos  guides  ~pirit~~el~. devant  Dirii  lui-nihie,  dr forfaire  ii cette  obli-
                                     gxiio~i.
                                     This  waa  the  iarnous  prunouncemerit  so  Iung  awaited  and  ieared
                                 by  the  Liherals.  As  Tarte  told  J.  Willisori,  the  editor  of  tlie  Toronto
                                 Globe, it  nas not "as  wicked  as it miglit have been,  although it is doubt-
                                 less  direeted  agaiiist  us.. . .  We  will  lie  able  to  Isce  the  maiidrmenl
                                 ivit hout  rnuch  liise,  1 thirik."'  ")   E.  Pacaud  ivas  as  optimietie  in  his
                                 1'Eleeteur:
                                     NDUS ~ie pouvons  nim.  ddcndre  de  doriner  expression  nu  scntitiient
                                     ~8iikral de  .c.~iisfdctiuii 11n'éprriui.e  la  population   FJ tholirlue.   Lcs
                                     politiciens  in!;rej4s  qui,  d'aranrr  se  frottaient  les  niains  de  jnir  à  la
                                     persprctivr  rlur  14  moitit  dc  la  famille  catholjqur  serait  bl~ssEr dans
                                     ses  syiiipzthjes  ei  se;  convic.tions  poliliquzc,  ont  été  désappointé5.';li'
                                     The dstiger,  however,  did  riot  lie iri the mildriess of  the .Vrrrtdcrneni
                                 liiit  ratlier  in  the interprctatiori  gii'en  io it  and the  use  wliich  Co1isert.a-
                                 tive  politiciaris  made of  it.  The?  ii9ed  it  tu  demoiistrate  tliat  the Chureh
                                 was  solidly  liehiiid  thcni  iii  thcir  efforts  to  salve  tlie  Manitoba  Sehools
                                 criais.  The Bishups,  ii:itli  the  cxeep~ion of  Bishop  Ema~d.' Ssve it  ihe
                                 most  ex11 eme  iriterpretatiori  possible.  Even  thougli the  ~Mandem~rtt did
                                 not  stipulate iri  exaet tcrrns  what  tlie Iegislatiori  sliould  be,  there  wyas no
                                 doribt  in  tlieir  nliiids  that  ihe  rernedinl  legialatjori  as  proposed  bg  the
                                 Conservatives  was  ihe solution they  wanted.  It  was  "urie  lairte  grave",
                                 as th?  Fishop  ol Rimouski  trild  a  pari~h priest,  "pour  uii  catholique  de
                                 donrier  sin  vote  3  lin  candidat  qui  ii'appuicra  pas  la  loi  rkl-iaratriee.
                                 aceeptée  par  les EvGqnes,  à l'eli'et  de  tetablir  Ics kcolea  catlioliques &pa-
                                 rées  dri  Mar~itoba."~~Vhc bishops  irid~ied 011  written  and  arilcrnri
                                 deelaration~ from  carididates  to  rhis  effect.  How  it  ivns  prissil~le in  a
                                 representative srstem siicli as Cariada to  exact 5uch a forma1 promige was
                                 qriestioned at least  by  the  Bishop of  Valleyfield  whri  feit it  "bicn  difl ieile
                                 de  faire fonetionuer  avaritageusernent  un  pareil  ev&me  avec  rititre  con-
                                 stitntion."("'
                                     The Bishop  of  Ttiree Aivcrj even  went  so far as to declare war  on
                                 Laurier  and thc  Liberal  party  by  reviving  the  old  charges  of  Catholic-
                                 Liheralisni.  He  acconipariied  tlie  reading  of  the  Mafidenten,t  with  a
                                 sermon  which  hc  called:  L'Appltcarian  de  la  Doctrine  CarhoIiqr~e 8  la
                                 Question  de3  Ecoles  du Manitoba.  Before  s  rast crowd  assembled  in


                                 (  2  "'ht~rc  Pastorale dc NNSS  le< .4rchevèqucs ri  Evêrlucj  des Provincr~ EcclE-
                                      sinstiqiito  de Ouibdc, de hîonir~al et d'Ottawa".  Msy 6,  1HYG.  In .Mriridernen;~,
                                       lettre^  Pnsiorules,  Circdaires  CL autres  Documents  publié3  dons  le  U~ucèse
                                      de  V~iiirreirl, XII,  ~ip. 1M fi.  The Bishop*  Lad difficulty  reachiug  unniiihiity.
                                      Archbibhop  Falire  s!itl  LIiihop  Emarrl  refused  IO  sign  a  htri  iIlnniJemenr.
                                      Archliisliop  Fabre  rallied  to  ~he oiher  bishops  but  Emard  only  signcd  when
                                      il,;% gcnrral  sraiemcnt  was  drnfid.  Ou  tliis  sec  Episcopal  Archives  o(  51.
                                      Hyacinthe,  Ji"  hlorea~i iri  )fa'   Emard.  hIay  9, 1H'Xi.
                                 (54)  Pulilir  Archives  of  Ca~inda, Willison Papers.  Tarte  to  Willisori, May  17, 1596.
                                 (5;)  I.'Ele~i~~r. hiau  lR.  1896.
                                 (3;)  %pisc&l'hrc~ives-'oi  Rimo~iski. Mur illais  io  AISr  Lebci,  June  26,  1896.
                                 l:r)   E.A.?iI., 5,fKr Eiuard  tu  MKr Falire.  dpril  23,  1896.
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160