Page 182 - Transcriptions d'actes notariés - Tome 20 - 1682-1686
P. 182

The  result  was  a  settled  hoetility  on  the  part  of  the  Londotiers  to
                              al1 attempts  to  raise  money  for  lrelatid.  On  Oct.  11,  1645, the  House
                              of  Commons  atternpted  tu  borrow  motiey  irom  the  Lundotiers  atid  was
                              met  by  a  blank  refusal.
                                  On  Nov.  11,  1û45,  the  London  civic  government  demunstrated
                              their  support for  kheir  merchants by  a  petiiioti  to  the  Commons urging
                              that  the  petition  of  the  London Adventurers  be  taken  into consideration
                              and  such  action  taken  "as  may  eucourage  the  said  Commi~tee and
                              Ad~enturers".(~O)

                                  On the same day a paper  wae presetited  to the Clotworthy Commiitee
                              by William Hawkins, one of  the most prominent oi ihe London  merehants
                              interested  in  Ireland,  outlining  prupositions  for  Ireland.  Four  eities
                              were  to  be  chosen  by  the  Adventurers  which  sould be  put  up  for  sale.
                              In addition al1 persons who sere ahle to prove that  they were owed  debts
                              a:  the  beginning of  the  Rehellion,  should,  on the  invesiin~ of  one  third
                              or one  quarter  of  the  sum  uwed,  have  the  whole  deLt  secured  on  land.
                              Some weeks  later  the London  Adventurers oflered  to contribute 520,iiW
                              to the cause if  their requests were granted.
                                  The  netiiion  is  intereatincr  Lecause  of  the  evidence  it  affords  of
                                                     -
                                                        U
                              London  obinion  regarding  ihe  nature  of  the  eventual  ettlement  whieh
                              they  felt  should  be  eflected  in  Ireland.  Al1  their  propositious,  ~hey
                              aaserted,  only  tended  to  the  re-establishment  of  stable  governinent  in
                              Ireland "and  the  better  peopling and civilizing  of  that Realm. . . to eff ect
                              a  good  and speedy plantation  of  that  Kingdom.  wiih a  religious  people,
                              in  the plaee.. . of  that  ldolatruus  Nation  the  Irieh  ReLals."  If  Parlia-
                              ment  wou1d  "give  thoee  lands  freely  to  men  thus  qualified  and  under-
                              taking. . .", that  end  would  be  accomplished  wiih  "the  most  speed  and
                              ~ecurity."[~~'i Among  other  benefits  accruing  from  their  schemes  wae
                              the  possibiIity  that  "The  Protestant  party  throwout  Chrisrendom,  will
                              the  rather  also  be  enconraged  to  joyn  with  ris  in  thie  Rreat  work  of
                              Reiormation,  and a  iruitful  and good  land  will  thus again  ere  long  Le
                              repeopled  to  live  under  the  Sunshine of the Gospel..  ."'")
                                  The  House  of  Commous  appearfi  to  have  remembered  this  petition;
                              at  any  rate,  in  January  1646,  when  the  defeated  and  desperate  King
                              Charles  was  vaiuly  hoping  for  a  negotiated  peace  wiih  the  Parliament,
                              the  Commons resolved  that  one  of  the  peace  couditions  should  be  that
                              the King should  agree to the "utter  Abolition  of  Popery"  in  Ireland.'"'
                              Charles was at this time negotiating with the Irish for  iheir support  and
                              when, a ferv weeks later evidence of his ue~otiations with the Irish through
                              the Earl  of Glamorgan  lell jnto  the  hantls  of  the Parliamentarians,  they
                              denionstratd their  usnal eensitivity.  When  ~he eviclence  of  the negotia-
                              tion  and  of  the  King's  proniise  of  toleration  iur the Catholics  of  lreland


                                   Journala  of  the  House  of  Lords,  vii,  p.  695.
                              (20)  Rensons  delircred. . .  B.h,f.  Thornason  Coll.,  E 313  (7)  Jan. 2,  1645-6.
                              (21)  Ibid.,  p.  13.
                              2  )  JournaIn  of  ihe House of  Commons,  iv.,  pp. 39+5;  L. Whitaker,  Parliameulery
                                   Mary,  B.M.  Add.  hlS.  31,  116,  f.  252.
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187